JURÍDIA – Good practices in-house training for optimizing commercial marketing projects’ effectiveness
In relation to law, it is not about the norm but the legal norm. It is not about the existence of any norm but about the legal norm. Because it is the norm harmonious with the law. With what is defined in the law. With the legal must be. That is, it is the form of the existence of the legal norm. It is the way in which each (all, the, the whole of) legal norm exists. Including the (each, all, the whole of the) legal norm related to the existence of the (each, all, the whole of the) norm that is not harmonious with what is defined in the law.
Therefore, (legally) it is the norm related to the form of the existence of (the) legal rights and (of, the) legal duties (that is, rights and duties defined in the law). That is, (related) to the form of the existence of freedom. With the form of existence for freedom. With the form that must exist for there to exist the (one, some, form of the, existence of) freedom. Therefore, legal rights and duties are the forms of the existence of (for the existence of) freedom. Therefore, each legal norm defines (a) each form of existence that must exist for the existence of (for it to exist) freedom. Therefore, the whole of the form of the existence of the legal norm defines the form of the existence (of the whole, of the form, of the existence) of freedom.
Therefore, the (each, the whole of) legal norm must be complied with. It must be complied with what is defined in it. To the measure of the way in which it applies. Tailored to each legal relationship. That is, based on the form in which there is each relationship between human beings in (relation to) which there are legal rights and duties. That is, to the measure of each environment related to the (with the form, of existence, of) law. That is, to the extent of each environment related to (what is defined in) the legal must be. That is, tailored to each environment that has a legal must be. That is, to the measure of each form of existence that must exist in a harmonious way with the (its) legal must be. That is, to the extent of each form of existence that must exist from (with, under) the form (of existence) of its legal must be. That is, to the extent of each environment in which freedom must exist (including, can exist).
Therefore, the law must be complied with. With what is defined in the law. That is, with the whole of the form of the existence of the legal norm. Therefore, the whole of the form of the existence of the legal norm exists based on the result of the union of the legal norms (existing, that exist). Therefore, legal norms are the forms of the existence of freedom. Therefore, the legal norms that exist are improving (making effective, simplifying, optimizing, facilitating, allowing) the form of the existence of freedom. That is why the law is evolutionary. But, at the same time, therefore, the law is the legal must be. And that is why something is only legal, something is only part of the law, something is only a legal norm, something is only part of the legal must be, something is only part of the whole of the legal norm, when it is harmonious (when it coincides) with what is defined in (the whole of) the form of the existence of the law.
Therefore, all (every, any, the, the whole of) the legal norm must be complied with. Every (each) legal norm is part of the form of the existence of (the) law. That is why it is about the fulfillment of the law. To comply with (the whole of) what is defined in the (all of) law. Based on the form (of existence) of the application of the law. That is, based on the way in which the law is applied. In each legal relationship. Properly, in each environment related to (what is defined in) law. It is about (the, one, some, form of, the existence of) the enjoyment of legal rights and (of) the fulfillment of legal duties. It is about the (one, some, form of, existence of) legal validity. It is about the (one, some, form of, existence of) freedom. It is about the existence of good. Of the good. Of the legally valid (of the good, of the form of, existence of, the good, the effective, the free) quality of life.
Therefore, there is no (one, some, form of the, existence of) hierarchy in relation to the form of the existence of legal norms. Another thing is that there is the whole of the legal norm. And another thing is that something (only) is part of the law when it is harmonious with what is defined in the whole of the form of the existence of the law. Therefore, it is about that what is defined in the whole of the legal norm be applied in each environment related to what is defined in the law. To the extent of the way in which each environment in which there are (exist, apply) legal rights and duties exists.
Therefore, it about legal validity existence. It is about the legal validity form (way) of existence. It is about that each environment related to what is defined in the law (that is, with the legal must be) exists in a way in relation to which there is (the form of, the existence of) legal validity. It is about the (one, some, form of) existence of good. Of the good. It is about that each being (subject, human and non-human, and object) related to (what is defined in) the law exists well. In a good way. It is about existing well. It is about existing well. It is about good life (including, it is about the good existence). It’s about freedom. Which (only) exists when (if, in relation to the form of its existence, that is, if, when, in relation to the form in which it exists, including, applies, proceeds, including, must exist, including, can exist, the, freedom) there is the good (that is, what is good, that is, what is legally valid).