JURÍDIA – Good practices in-house training for optimizing commercial marketing projects’ effectiveness

In our theory of preventive law of consumption in digital advertising legal security exists when there is legal effectiveness in the case —making the (juridically) valid case—. This means: legal security exists when there is the enjoyment of rights and the fulfillment of the duties (pertinent) in the case. Because: legal security is when the case is binding to be valid (legally). And: the (that) validity (legal) exists when there is (the) effectiveness (legal). And: effectiveness (legal) exists when there is (the) enjoyment of rights and compliance with the duties (pertinent) in the case (depending on the case and to the extent of the case).

Properly: the legal effectiveness exists when the case coincides with the duty to be (legal) defined in the philosophy of law, the theory of law and the rules -particular- of the State (or: States, depending on the case) of Law involved (involved ) in, including: related to, his being -in the being of the case- (to the extent of the case -to the extent of the facts of the case.To the extent of the case understood as a fact, a final event, a total event , a definite fact, a definite fact, created by the union of, each and all, its facts, to the extent of the case understood as a juridical, extracontractual and / or contractual, defined relationship: Properly: to the extent of being of the case, to the extent of being called case-). Then: both the philosophy of law and the theory of law as the rules -particular- of the State (or: States, as the case may be) of Law involved (involved) are norms (clarifying that: the rules of the Rule of Law are, only they are, legal norms when they are harmonious with philosophy and the theory of law, otherwise they are arbitrary acts, that’s why: they are only legal norms when they are created in a discretional way that makes them harmonious with the philosophy and theory of the law. right) because they define the (legal) condition that must be met, which must have, properly: what it should be, the (be of the) case to be valid (legally) -included: to be, included: to have, valid, legal- and, consequently, to be (included: to have) efficacy and legal security.

Therefore: the (only) necessary standards for the valid case to exist (legally) are those that are (are) necessary for there to be legal effectiveness and these (those) are those that are (are) necessary for there to be legal security. Then: the rules -particular- of the (of each) State of Law involved should only be those that complement the norms of philosophy and the theory of law. Those are the (unique) norms -particular- necessary of the (of each) Rule of Law. Therefore: (first) you must know the philosophy and the theory of law to define the need for the rules -particular- that should exist in the (in each) State of Law (as a complement to the rules of philosophy and the theory of law -of being called law-).

Then: in the Rule of Law there should be no rules -particular- that complicate (unnecessarily) -the effectiveness. That is to say: the efficiency and effectiveness of the (norms) of philosophy and the theory of law. Because: that (this) affects the (possibility of) existence of (the) validity (legal). In consequence: of (the) legal effectiveness. Consequently: of (the) legal security. In short: that (this) affects the enjoyment of rights and compliance with the duties in the case (depending on the case and to the extent of the case). Affecting the quality of life (the quality of life defined in the being called right – to be created by the result of the union created by all beings: a) Philosophy of law; b) Theory of law; and c) Rules, particular, of the Rule of Law. Rules that only exist, that are only right, that are only, the, a, must be legal, if they are harmonious with beings a) and b). With philosophy and the theory of law. Because those, these, beings are the basis of the right. Of being called right. They are the foundations of that being. They are the structure of that being. They are what define the condition of existence, the situation of existence and the validity of that being. Properly: they are the foundations of existence of that being-).

Therefore: the validity, effectiveness and legal security depend on the minimalist form. Of the (a) minimalist form that makes that in the Rule of Law (only) exist the norms -particular- necessary (in fact: how the norms of the Rule of Law are only right if they are harmonic with the philosophy and the theory of law , the -particular- norms of the Rule of Law are only right when, yes, they are necessary.The necessary norms of the, including: in the, Rule of Law are the only ones that are right. In fact: The rule of law that fulfills this, that, condition is the rule of law, the rest is not a state of law, and: when it exists, the rule of law there is legal security in its being. each being, including: if each case, involved in that being is valid, legally, there is validity and legal effectiveness in its being, in being called Rule of Law, in the Rule of Law). And: in the minimalist way that makes each human being involved in the case (depending on the legal profile in the case) make each being (human and / or non-human, depending on the case) involved in the case is valid ( legally) and that the being of the case, understood as the result of the union created by all the beings involved in the case, is valid (legally). Making the case valid (legally). Therefore: making the case effective (legally). Therefore: making the (juridically) safe (including: certain) case.